December 2005

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for December 2005.

Search in 2005 … and 2006?

John Battelle, former editor of Wired magazine, is the leading commentator on search. In November he published his good read The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. In the concluding chapter on the future of search he says:

As every engineer in the search field loves to tell you, search is at best 5% solved. … Search needs to solve what so far has been a rather intractable problem: the invisible web … everything that is available via the web but has yet to be found by search engines … walled off from search for commercial or technological reasons. [In the future] search will be let loose on all manner of devices. … Anywhere there might be a chip, there can and most likely will be search.

These are his predictions for 2006.

And watch out for IPv6, the upgrade to the internet that will connect not just phones and TVs but kettles and fridges to the net.

Here’s the list.

Web search:

Google

Google Image Search

Google News

Google University Search

Google Blog Search beta

Goods and services:

Froogle beta

Google Base beta

Maps and directions; local businesses:

Google Local / Google Maps beta (map data from Tele Atlas; business listings from Yell.com)

Book content:

Google Book Search beta (previously Google print)

Scholarly papers:

Google Scholar beta

Your desktop:

Google Desktop beta

A valuable post on Offshoring from Joy London’s Excited Utterances blog, pointing to the trend in legal process outsourcing (LPO), particularly to India, and providing links to the main players:

With the increasing acceptance of India as a preferred offshoring destination, a large number of non-CRM and non-transaction related services are being offshored. Among these, a range of higher-value services, like legal services, requiring not just skill, but ‘knowledge‘ are rapidly gaining traction. (italics mine)

So although law firm IT directors say they are sending precious little work overseas, it appears that some substantive and administrative legal functions (e.g., document drafting, legal research, document discovery, paralegal and other administrative and secretarial support services) are being outsourced to India. Otherwise, why have we seen such a proliferation of India-based legal outsourcers.

Links and law

Tim Berners-Lee, father of the web, has published his first blog post as a member of the Decentralized Information Group (DIG) blog. DIG explores technical, institutional, and public policy questions necessary to advance the development of global, decentralized information environments.

He points to his Design Issues writings as the home of his previous “blog”. It is interesting to note that in 1997 he posted a piece about Links and Law: Myths.

The myths he then debunked were these:

  • A normal link is an incitement to copy the linked document in a way which infringes copyright
  • Making a link to a document makes your document more valuable and therefore is a right for which you should pay
  • Making a link to someone’s publicly readable document is an infringement of privacy

In conclusion he wrote:

There are some fundamental principles about links on which the Web is based. These principles allow the world of distributed hypertext to work. Lawyers, users and technology and content providers must all agree to respect these principles which have been outlined.

It is difficult to emphasize how important these issues are for society. The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States, for example, addresses the right to speak. The right to make reference to something is inherent in that right. On the web, to make reference without making a link is possible but ineffective – like speaking but with a paper bag over your head.

Many information providers continue to try to subvert these principles. For example TimesOnline seeks to impose on you the obligation not to “set up links from any website controlled by you to any Micro Site, except to the home page of a particular Website, without our express written permission”. So I should not, for example, link directly to this recent article by Richard Susskind on the Government website boom.