This time from Winckworth Sherwood.
In its loosest sense a blog is simply an online diary with posts presented in reverse chronological order. On this definition, this is a blog. So why do I take issue? Because 55 million bloggers define a blog as much more than this and you do yourself no favours by pretending you have what you have not.
It is, frankly, embarrassing that well-paid marketing people should suggest to the firm that such a page be called a blog; it is even more embarrassing that the firm should go along with this.
LawCareers.net tellingly describes it as “very voguish“. Halogen.no also has something to say about it, but I know not what.
Comments are now closed.

1 comment