Feeds

You are currently browsing the archive for the Feeds category.

Some time ago I set up a Friendfeed account and plugged in a couple of my feeds. I did not pay it any further attention until recently I noticed a number of my band of followers were subscribing to my Friendfeed.

So I checked out why. Via the Twitterverse I was pointed to this great post on Friendfeed for Lawyers on Advocate’s Studio by Martha Sperry, an attorney in the Boston. It tells you all you need to know.

Rest in Peace, RSS – flame bait from Steve Gillmor.

It’s time to get completely off RSS and switch to Twitter. RSS just doesn’t cut it anymore. The River of News has become the East River of news, which means it’s not worth swimming in if you get my drift.

Twitter is a sucker’s game that only serves the needs of a tiny elite – flame bait from Seth Finkelstein.

Twitter is low-level celebrity for the chattering class. And the pathologies of celebrity are all on display, including the exploitative industries that prey on the human desire to be heard and noticed. My answer to Twitter’s slogan of “What are you doing?” is: “Not playing a sucker’s game.”

RSS is dead? My ass… by Dave Winer – he should know.

Mick Jagger didn’t say Muddy Waters or Chuck Berry are dead. He loved those guys. Their work lived on in his music, and he was good to them. It’s time for the tech biz to learn about love, Steve. Open your heart and sing happy birthday to RSS. It’s been very good to you. You should be good to RSS, though god knows most of the icons of tech have been really unappreciative at the gifts RSS brought them. It’s really sad what grumpy pissy jerks these guys are.

Must have been asleep or too busy these last few months to notice that the Law Society Gazette has morphed into a wonderful site:

Online the Gazette is as radically changed [as the print edition], with all sections of the magazine represented. Most importantly, each area of Gazette coverage is now easily accessible – we have flattened the site’s structure to make things easier to find, and the home page has everything we do right at the top of the page.

Yes, and it’s visually clean and very pleasing. Not only that, chums – and this is something you should make greater play of – you have also provided feeds for each of the main sections:

News

Opinion

Features

In Business

In Practice

Obiter

Brilliant stuff. Now all that’s needed is to add commenting for the opinion sections and subject feeds for your Law Reports and I’ll nominate you for Law Mag of the Year.

exCiting Times

I’ve mentioned Feedity before – a natty feed generator which will scrape a web page and deliver a feed based on the linked list(s) it finds there. It usually returns some unwanted links too, but you can then tweek the feed to deliver just the main items.

Since last I wrote, Feedity has moved to a paid model for anything over and above use in a personal feed reader.

I’ve just used Feedity to generate a feed from Times Law Reports since they don’t produce one themselves. I checked their T&C’s when doing this. They refer to using Times “content” and as these are just headlines linked to their site, I feel OK about it, though expect a take down notice soon! I’ve also piped the feed into my lawtweets Twitter account. Having done that I’d better pay Feedity $39.

Another feed you may find useful is the Justis Alert for Latest cases from WLR. You need to be a Justis WLR subscriber to access the reports themselves. However, in addition to the linked case name, the feed does deliver the keywords and WLR cite in the description.

These and more feeds are aggregated in my Lawfeeder.

Catching up

Been away on protracted hols. Quite possible to have kept posting of course, but did not have the inclination. Had I done so, here’s a few things I might have posted about:

Martindale-Hubbell Connected

In July Robert Ambroggi took an exclusive first look. It’s now out in public beta. Will this fly or crash?

The rise of Twitter for lawyers

Adrian Lurssen on JD Supra posted a list of 145 Lawyers (and Legal Professionals) to Follow on Twitter; the list has now grown to 250. Kevin O’Keefe has also been posting a lot about lawyers’ use of Twitter. So we’re now in the talking it up phase; as to how usesful a tool it will turn out to be, the jury will be out for some time longer.

Information Overlord goes RSS crazy

Scott Vine posted an impressive list of links for UK Central government departments, executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies with rss feeds and he’s followed it up with similar for several other European countries. Must be some kind of masochist.

The FindLaw gaming Google game

There’s been plenty more on this. An indifferent article on law.com sums up, but Kevin O’Keefe continues to be the man on the case.

LexMonitor

Congrats to LexBlog who have just launched LexMonitor, “a daily review of law blogs and journals highlighting prominent legal discussion as well as the lawyers and other professionals participating in this conversation.”

LexMonitor pulls feeds from nearly 2,000 sources and 5,000 authors, classifies them and serves them up, sliced and diced by subject category, author etc or by tags. And there’s more now and more to come. Great work Kevin, Rob and team.

In response to my last post, Susan Cartier Liebel raises the question of the legalities of streaming others’ feeds without permission. She points to her post Shouldn’t You Have To Ask Permission If You Want To Take A Blog’s Feed For Your Profit? which has attracted considerable comment.

Of course your content is your copyright and others should not copy it without your permission. But a feed can be repurposed in many ways, and we need to look at what parts of the feed are being copied and who profits.

Copyright lawyers will have to fill me in on the latest case law on all of this, but I think in practice we have despatched the question whether links are legal (is the web legal?) with a resounding yes. As Sir Tim father-of-the-web-but-not-a-lawyer Berners-Lee has said:

There are some fundamental principles about links on which the Web is based. These principles allow the world of distributed hypertext to work. Lawyers, users and technology and content providers must all agree to respect these principles.

What of link+title? In principle there is copyright in a title, but it’s hard to see anyone any longer seeking to enforce copyright here.

But an RSS feed is an aggregation, so what of a bunch of links+titles? Here there is a stronger case for saying that this aggregation is protected by copyright, and if we’re talking about an aggregation of links+titles+descriptions or even +excerpts, that is clearly protected. So let’s talk about permission, express or implied.

I don’t believe there’s any implied permission for others to republish feeds. But in practice, why publish a feed if you don’t want it to be republished? It will be, and there’s little you can do to stop it. You can frame some stern T & Cs or apply a more friendly CC licence, but most, whether intentionally or by default, will take little notice.

Susan makes much of others taking your (blog) feed “for profit”. We are all miffed if we see others profiting from our work at our expense. But, with feed repurposing, in most cases we profit too, sufficiently that we do not see it as being at our expense.

  • Google indexes, caches and republishes parts of my website, my blog, my feeds without my permission. Google profits handsomely, but I profit too.
  • Other specialist search engines and directories – like Tehcnorati, Blawg Search – also index and repurpose my content. If I’ve submitted my site to them, I’ve probably given them permission to do this, but in most cases my signing up only legitimates what they have been doing / would do anyway. (Susan, Technorati indexes your blog whether you’ve claimed it or not.) They profit, but I profit too.
  • Smaller fish might also republish my feeds, but in all cases short of their republishing my full text, I profit as much as or more than they do. All items link back to me. And I really am not going to lose sleep if they choose to wrap Google ads around it or seek to profit in other ways. (I do view sploggers etc as the scum of the earth, but I blame Google Adsense.)

So in practice, what we are all most concerned about is others claiming our real work – our full posts or articles – as their own; and there is a simple answer: if you want to protect your content, include only excerpts rather than full text in your feeds. Syndicate your metadata, not your data.

When I said at the turn of the last year that RSS would explode in 2007, I don’t think I was being particularly prescient.

The RSS standard was then sufficiently well established that it was only a matter of time (and in internet time, that means months rather than years) before it took hold. Blogs were already pumping out RSS as standard and most news sites were latching onto it; Firefox had added support for Live Bookmarks and I saw the release of IE7 as being the catalyst for wider awareness.

Although there are many desktop RSS readers around, most people are finding it more convenient to do their computing in “the cloud” and anecdotal evidence suggests that Google Reader is perhaps now the RSS reader of choice.

But the potential for RSS lies not simply in the benefits it provides for individuals to consume and manage breaking news/current awareness feeds for themselves, it lies in the literally endless opportunities it offers for us to repurpose that information to our own ends. There are numerous applications now that enable you to publish RSS feeds on your web pages; to aggregate and filter feeds and generate custom feeds from that; and to feed these feeds into services that themselves produce feeds.

The only problem I have with all this cool stuff is the nightmare vision that we are creating endless loops which sooner or later will bring the global network down!

In the UK legal field, there are plenty of useful blog and news feeds to be getting on with; but it is to their shame that, outside these spheres, established publishers have so far failed to come up with the goods:

  • the Statute Law Database – finally released after more than 14 years development – has not seen fit (despite my entreaties) to implement feeds of latest legislation (and if you do so, by year and number, both descending please!)
  • the law publishers may be doing things with their current awareness content behind the paywall, but the unarguable benefits of their publishing feeds of their latest publications have thus far escaped them (the only current exception being Wiley Law)
  • even BAILII – at the vanguard of the free legal web – does not yet (publicly) publish feeds of latest cases (they do produce an unannounced beta – from which a few pipes)

Get on with it!

RSS Cruiser

RSS Cruiser is a legal info buff who currently spends some time on the web looking for law-related RSS feeds, encountering instead (blogs apart) classic Web 1.0 pages that are little use to man or beast in this gimme-what-I-want-now age. These Web 1.0 pages are known as “false documents” in that they look pretty and give him the information he wants but are of little value in the grand Web 2.0 scheme of things. He still awaits rescue with his like-minded castaways.

What RC is after on these pages (since you ask) is little orange icons that look like this.

Turning specifically to law publishers’ new publication feeds (a particular bugbear of his – and he’s not alone) , sadly in a recent trawl he had 100% no shows. (But do note that a number of publishers provide feeds for their journals.)

So, to lighten up his day, he went where he knew he’d find thousands of the little gems – he did a search on Google images for RSS icon. Here’s some of the more interesting variations he found:

A roundup of recent legal info tools that have come to my attention but not been blogged yet:

law.librarians is a group blog set up by lo-fi librarian:

A bit of an experiment really. The template for this blog is called Prologue and it lets you (once you are logged in) blog in a Twitter-like fashion. I thought it would be pretty interesting to try it out with other law librarian bloggers. So far it’s a bit of a link blog, sharing resources and news, that sort of thing.

There are already 14 well-known librarians on board as contributors twittering madly. Looks like they’re having fun … and getting some useful work done.

Thanks too to lo-fi for spotting that Wildys now produce RSS feeds for new titles by subject category and also in aggregate.

Blackwell Online also provide feeds of new and forthcoming titles by broad subject including Law.

(Once again, publishers, if you produce your own feeds …)

And yet again thanks to lo-fi for neatly collating info and pretty pics of law and related podcasts.

So, it’s time for a new Podcasts section in infolaw Lawfinder.

« Older entries